Beautiful Creatures Review

beautiful-creatures-poster

What would you get if you crossed Steven King’s Carrie with Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight Saga, and crossed it a few more times with Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird? Probably a lot of copyright suits, but you would also get something akin to Beautiful Creatures. Following in the footsteps of the Twilight saga, Beautiful Creatures is another installment in the newly formed “paranormal teen romance” genre. Unlike Twilight, Creatures mercifully takes a more tongue-in-cheek venture into a genre otherwise marked by cringe-worthy melodrama. Moreover, the film helps it’s case by presenting sympathetic and refreshingly dynamic characters. Beautiful Creatures will not win any awards, nor will it make or break any of the careers of its cast.

Directed by Richard LaGravanese, Beautiful Creatures is an adaptation of a 2009 teen romance novel of the same name. LaGravanese is to be commended first and foremost for his excellent choices in casting and as well as adhering to an established tone. It seems almost as though he understood that the novel was kind of a cash in on the exploding popularity of the genre and instead of focusing on the ultra-grittiness and forced realism of its competition, he took the story for the ludicrous subject that it was and ran with it. More surprisingly, the direction in which he steers the film makes it an exceptionally entertaining experience.

Starring relative newcomers Alden Ehrenreich and Englert as star-crossed lovers Ethan Wate and Lena Duchannes, respectively, the chemistry between these two is actually generally charming, and in a bold departure from genre conventions, the attraction seems more genuine than two cardboard cutouts leaning against each other. Also making an appearance is legendary Jeremy Irons along with Emma Thompson who steal every scene they’re in. The thing that I appreciate about the acting here is that the entire cast seems genuinely pleased to be working and is actually invested in what is happening on-screen. This sentiment may seem like a given, but compared to the acting in other films like Twilight whose actors visibly stopped caring eventually, it’s nice to have something substantial to work with.

Beautiful Creatures is in the fortunate position of being compared to Twilight because they’re both integral properties in a relatively new genre. Granted, a piece of rotting meat covered in dog puke would compare favorably to Twilight, so the challenge will be to evaluate the film on its own merit. It was a pleasure to see a relationship with more spark than a blackout at a rubber factory, and indeed there was some character building here that was refreshing amid the typical ‘blockhead 1 falls for blockhead 2’ arbitrary romantic subplot. Likewise, it was nice to see the strengthening relationship of the charters become plot-critical as opposed to being shoehorned in. The unconventionally attractive nature of the two protagonists is also a welcome respite from the stereotypical chiseled athlete and blonde bean pole that we normally see in teen romances.

On the other hand though, it’s a little hard to take things seriously as much effort is being expended on making us care about the charters as people when most of the other charters in the film walk around like they just stepped out of the Rocky Horror Picture Show. I don’t consider this to be too much of an infraction though because I still appreciate the fact that you can’t really pull of this extravaganza as anything else but a fun, campy joy-ride. In a way, the film is campy without being disingenuous, which I realize seems like a contradiction, but I actually feel as though a really commendable amount of effort went into making an otherwise goofy film engaging.

A word, however, on themes. I enjoyed how the film seemed to set up a commentary on intolerance in the American deep South, which could have served as an allegory for a multitude of other issues, from racial equality to gay rights. Unfortunately, however, all of its posturing is ultimately for naught as the whole issue if dropped half way through the film. When such an effort is made to establish an underlying conflict such as this, it is disheartening to see it dropped off the face of the earth with out so much as a backwards glance. My advice is that if an effort is made to establish a theme, for the love of all that’s holy, cary it out to its logical conclusion rather than letting it languish in obscurity during the second and third acts.

When determining whether or not a film was good, one must ultimately answer one simple question: Did I have fun? In my case, the answer is a resounding “yes.” I had a lot of fun. The dialogue was witty, the characters were charming, and the conflict was engaging while remaining cognizant of its absurdity. For all of its faults, Beautiful Creatures is a cute, enjoyable journey into the fun side of paranormal teen romance and was well worth the price of admission.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5

Advertisements

One thought on “Beautiful Creatures Review

  1. rochpikey February 27, 2013 / 9:27 pm

    I have been on the fence about whether or not to see this movie. I really disliked the Twilight movies but something about the trailer for this made it look more interesting than your typical (as you called it) “paranormal teen romance” genre movie. Glad to hear it trumps Twilight and I figured it had to since it drew Irons and Thompson to it. Plus Emmy Rossum is easy on the eyes even though I know she plays a “bad” witch in this. Nice review!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s