Oz: The Great and Powerful Review

Have you ever wanted to be someone else? Have you ever been tired of your normal, everyday existence and instead yearned for a life of excitement? This question is especially poignant in regards to Oz because it lies at the heart of the protagonist’s struggle and also sums up the film’s own aims as well. Aspiring magician Oscar Diggs wants, above all else, to be a legendary performer, while the film itself wants to be Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland so badly that you can almost see the strain. Oz: The Great and Powerful bills itself as the first movie event of the year, yet in reality it’s nothing more than a fizzling disappointment.

Sam Raimi, who has earned a place in the hearts of generations of horror fans for his work on the iconic Evil Dead series as well as a host of other admirable accomplishments, directs this foray into calamity and frustration. James Franco as wannabe wizard Oscar Diggs strikes the wrong note with his slightly overblown and overacted performance which seems disingenuous in all the wrong circumstances. While it’s established that Diggs is nothing but a glorified conman who frequently hides behind a facade of grandeur, he never readjusts when he’s trying to be sincere which makes the tone come across as goofy in many cases. My suspicion is the Franco’s overacting is a compensation for having little to no visual cues when the scenes were shot, as a result of many of the set pieces and even characters being computer generated. In addition to Franco’s floundering, it seems as though the only reason that Mila Kunis was involved in this production at all was to see if Raimi could squeeze her into a pair of tight leather pants. Indeed, even though her performance wasn’t unwatchable, she seemed to have a lot of the problems that Franco did and there were many other, better choices for the role.

The question at the front of my mind after having seen Oz is this: If the vast majority of set pieces and characters are computer generated (not particularly well, I might add), why didn’t they just decide to animate the entire thing? Instead of the seamless interplay between real world and computer generated objects- a la Avatar (2009)- Oz ends up looking like a 2013 production of Space Jam and frankly, it’s extremely distracting. Computer generated characters move fluidly enough on their own, but when interacting with or even standing near actual people, they suddenly take on this unsettling, uncanny valley-esque range of motion. More surprising is the fact that a Walt Disney Studios film like this one has such shoddy animation, when Disney has consistently produced some of the best animated films around. On the other hand though, maybe we’re supposed to take all of this in through a filter of irony. Just as the original 1939 Oz looks charmingly dated by today’s standards, perhaps Raimi wants to make an artistic statement and come full circle by making his prequel look like complete ass. Yep, and maybe I will declared King of England.

I mentioned a moment ago that Oz bloodily rips off Alice In Wonderland, which in reality is no surprise with the involvement of art director Robert Stromberg, who leant his distinctive visual style to both Alice as well as Avatar. Stromberg’s imagination generally yields impressive outdoor expanses and lush vistas, and while they certainly return in abundance in Oz, their downfall seems to lie in their technical execution rather than their artistic realization. Likewise, Raimi actually wanted Johnny Depp to play the wizard. Allegedly, Depp was initially intrigued by the role, but as fate would have it, he was already busy working an another 2013 release, The Lone Ranger. If Depp had taken the role, they might as well have renamed the film to “Alice in Wonderland 2: We’re really phoning it in now.”

I think that a lot of what was wrong with this film stemmed from the fact that we all knew how it was going to end. I mean, we knew how it was going to end anyway- this is a Disney movie after all- but more than that, we know that the wizard has to save the day so that the events of The Wizard of Oz can occur. Sadly, the plot is so predictable and bland that there’s really not much to save it from stagnation. Though Oz was a miss, hopefully Raimi will be able to redeem himself soon as financier of the highly anticipated Evil Dead remake in early April.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Oz: The Great and Powerful Review

  1. greercn March 17, 2013 / 2:17 am

    I liked this a lot more than you did and I thought the 3D was stunning enough to make me overlook the points you make. I like James Franco in this. I love the little doll and the monkey. Perhaps I am too easily pleased, but I really enjoyed it although all the points you make are valid!

  2. Albert Cantu March 17, 2013 / 1:57 pm

    I saw it in traditional 2D so it’s certainly possible that the 3D could have made a significant difference.

    • Gabriel Vogel March 17, 2013 / 3:56 pm

      I can attest to this. The 3D in Oz is fantastic.

  3. mathias42 March 18, 2013 / 7:17 am

    I don’t get it. I just don’t get it. I’ve heard nothing but hate for this film. For me, this was the OZ movie I wanted to see all my life, especially after I discovered the books. It’s not a deconstruction, it’s not a reimagining, it’s far more true to the books than much of what we’ve seen in the last twenty years. The emerald City is finally realized in a proper scale. The look of the film pays homage to the Wizard of OZ without being a slave to it (I think of this when I see the plastic looking flowers).

    I saw Alice In Wonderland and disliked it. There wasn’t enough there to really move me. I’m also not a Raimi apologist. He has good days and bad ones. He got Spider-Man right, but Peter Parker wrong. Darkman does nothing for me (but then again, it was second prize really. He wanted do The Shadow and couldn’t secure the rights). But this, this was one of the best movies from him ve seen in years. I just don’t get why no one else seems to think so. I spent most of it with my jawon the floor, watching where they were going. My seven-year-old daughter did too….and she’s a fan of OZ too (The first time she saw The Wizard of OZ was in a theatre about a year and a half ago when the Capitol screened it).

    No disappointment to me at all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s